
(A girl’s best friend indeed…)
So, some distressing news for all men who are not exactly part of the Russian oligarchy - but first, a short digression and a few questions solely aimed at the males of our species. Women, hedgehogs and buttercups may look away now, if they so wish.
Right, how many of you are convinced that you are:
a) excellent drivers
b) better at holding your liquor than most
c) good at telling jokes and/or
d) way above average in the sack?
Chances are that most men will consider themselves above average in all or at least most of these fields - which, of course, means that a large majority of us are sadly delusional about these things. This may come as a shock to, let’s say, 95% of all males but will not be much of a surprise to 99% of all women.
Which, I would suggest, may go a long way to explaining the following findings of some Newcastle University psychologists - though I’m sure it won’t soothe the pain or stroke the egos of most men:
Scientists have found that the pleasure women get from making love is directly linked to the size of their partner’s bank balance. They found that the wealthier a man is, the more frequently his partner has orgasms. “Women’s orgasm frequency increases with the income of their partner,” said Dr Thomas Pollet, the Newcastle University psychologist behind the research. He believes the phenomenon is an “evolutionary adaptation” that is hard-wired into women, driving them to select men on the basis of their perceived quality.
Now, I think that most of us (men, I mean; not those women, hedgehogs and buttercups) will agree that the large majority of men are not as pretty as Cristiano Ronaldo or as ruggedly handsome as Daniel Craig. There are quite a few, almost archetypical moulds when it comes to sex appeal: From Marlon Brando’s simmering rage to Hugh Grant’s helpless, boyish charms; from the almost monstrously grotesque ruin that is the elder Jack Nicholson to the impish Peter Pan appeal of the average boy band line-up.
All of these types (and more) can be highly attractive to certain percentages of women but I can guarantee you that around 95% of all men would never survive an audition for any of these various roles, whatever we tell ourselves when we look in our mirrors (or into our sixth or seventh glass of whiskey.)
Which is sad.
Yet true.
So, since we have established that most of us are much less accomplished than we would like to be when it comes to driving cars, holding our drinks, telling jokes and making love to those women who are not only willing to overlook all those defects but also our much less than perfect bodies and overall sex-appeal…
… well, then it should not come as a surprise that a well-filled bank account is about the only, possibly truly exciting thing that most men are left with to bring pleasure or, at least, some solace to the women in their lives.
In other words, this latest and quite melancholic bit of research should not be seen as proof that most women are vile gold diggers but simply as an almost unavoidable fact of life and as a direct consequence of gross & collective male inadequacy.
You are not convinced… (I’m talking of the men, of course; not those women, hedgehogs and/or buttercups - I trust the latter are already with the programme.) Okay, so, let’s put it another way:
If someone in a restaurant, who’d been asked by the waiter how the meal was, had merely said that the table linen and the cutlery looked quite nice indeed, would this always mean that the person involved was too shallow and obsessed with the trappings of luxury to appreciate a good meal by itself?
Of course not.
It might simply have been the case that the soup was much too salty, the mutton undercooked, the potatoes burnt, the vegetables a reeking yet bland puddle of goo and the pudding as comforting & sweet as Dick Cheney’s smile - and if that was so, could you really blame the diner if she derived at least some quantum of solace from the fact that the cutlery and linen were of the finest quality that money can buy?

(Can you really blame them…?)